Current:Home > ScamsUS judge to weigh cattle industry request to halt Colorado wolf reintroduction -DollarDynamic
US judge to weigh cattle industry request to halt Colorado wolf reintroduction
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:41:00
A federal judge is set to consider on Thursday a request by Colorado’s cattle industry to block the impending reintroduction of gray wolves to the state under a voter-approved initiative.
State wildlife officials plan to capture up to 10 wolves from Oregon and begin releasing them in Colorado by Dec. 31 as they race to meet a deadline imposed under a 2020 ballot proposal that passed by a narrow margin.
The animals would be among the first gray wolves in Colorado in decades.
The Gunnison County Stockgrowers’ Association and Colorado Cattlemen’s Association filed a lawsuit Monday to halt the releases. They claim the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service failed to adequately review Colorado’s plan to release up to 50 wolves onto state and private land over the next several years.
Judge Regina M. Rodriguez scheduled a 10 a.m. hearing at the federal courthouse in Denver to hear arguments in the case.
Gray wolves were exterminated across most of the U.S. by the 1930s under government-sponsored poisoning and trapping campaigns. They received endangered species protections in 1975, when there were about 1,000 left in northern Minnesota.
Wolves have since rebounded in the Great Lakes region. They’ve also returned to numerous western states — Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Oregon, Washington and, most recently, California — following an earlier reintroduction effort that brought wolves from Canada to central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in the 1990s.
An estimated 7,500 wolves in about 1,400 packs now roam parts of the contiguous U.S. Their return to the central Rocky Mountains of Colorado would achieve a longstanding dream of wildlife advocates and fill in one of the last remaining major gaps in the species’ historical range in the western U.S.
A small number of wolves from the Yellowstone region journeyed across Wyoming to Colorado in recent years. Some of those animals were shot when they wandered back into Wyoming, where shooting them is legal.
Colorado officials say they are currently managing only two wolves in the state.
The plan to establish a permanent wolf population through releases of animals captured elsewhere has sharpened divides between rural and urban residents. City and suburban dwellers largely voted to reintroduce the apex predators into rural areas where ranchers worry about attacks on livestock that help drive local economies.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published an environmental review in September of what is called a 10(j) rule, which permits the killing of wolves in Colorado under certain scenarios — particularly in the defense of livestock — even though the animals are protected federally as an endangered species.
The rule is a key piece of Colorado’s reintroduction plan. The livestock groups contend the review of the rule failed to capture the full consequences of wolf reintroduction.
Colorado Assistant Attorney General Lisa Reynolds requested Thursday’s hearing after the livestock groups sought a temporary restraining order from Rodriguez to stop the wolf releases. Reynolds said in a Wednesday court filing that the releases would not begin prior to Dec. 17.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services spokesperson Joe Szuszwalak declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation.
veryGood! (632)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Chris Hemsworth Shares Rare Glimpse of Marvelous Family Vacation With His 3 Kids
- Al Gore Talks Climate Progress, Setbacks and the First Rule of Holes: Stop Digging
- Shocked by those extra monthly apartment fees? 3 big rental sites plan to reveal them
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- The Vampire Diaries' Kat Graham and Producer Darren Genet Break Up One Year After Engagement
- Planet Money Paper Club
- How to Watch the 2023 Emmy Nominations
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Gabrielle Union Has the Best Response to Critics of Her Cheeky Swimsuits
Ranking
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Corn Nourishes the Hopi Identity, but Climate-Driven Drought Is Stressing the Tribe’s Foods and Traditions
- Study: Higher Concentrations Of Arsenic, Uranium In Drinking Water In Black, Latino, Indigenous Communities
- Why the Feared Wave of Solar Panel Waste May Be Smaller and Arrive Later Than We Expected
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- The Capitol Christmas Tree Provides a Timely Reminder on Environmental Stewardship This Holiday Season
- Flood-Prone Communities in Virginia May Lose a Lifeline if Governor Pulls State Out of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
- West Baltimore Residents, Students Have Mixed Feelings About Water Quality After E. Coli Contamination
Recommendation
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
Restoring Watersheds, and Hope, After New Mexico’s Record-Breaking Wildfires
Amazon Prime Day Rare Deal: Get a Massage Therapy Gun With 14,000+ 5-Star Reviews for Just $32
Netflix shows steady growth amid writers and actors strikes
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
One Man’s Determined Fight for Solar Power in Rural Ohio
Want to Help Reduce PFC Emissions? Recycle Those Cans
California Regulators Approve Reduced Solar Compensation for Homeowners